AI Spending Has Grown. The Earnings Have Not Followed.

Almost every large company now uses AI. Few can show it in earnings, and closing that gap is a decision for the CEO.

Most companies still report no significant financial benefit from AI. Use has spread across functions, and chief executives now expect to wait longer for the return than they did a year ago.

The gap shows up in the budget. AI spending has moved from pilots to a recurring operating cost, and boards and investors now ask what it returns. Companies that added AI tools to existing processes report faster individual work. Few report a lower cost base or higher growth, because the process, the roles and the decision rights around the work stayed the same.

The companies reporting earnings impact make a small number of choices at the top. They select two or three areas where the economics are largest, redesign the full workflow in each, and hold a business leader, not the technology function, accountable for the result.

Three actions for the CEO:

1. Choose the business areas. Name the two or three where AI can change cost, revenue or capital needs, and stop funding scattered pilots outside them.

2. Assign business ownership. Give each business area a leader who owns the P&L result and the redesign of roles and processes.

3. Report value, not use. Ask finance to report AI results in earnings terms each quarter: cost removed, revenue added, capital released.

If your board asked which line of the income statement AI has changed this year, what would the answer be?

Subscribe to the GCCM Insights newsletter: https://www.linkedin.com/newsletters/gccm-insights-7232110651324739585/